The obstructive role of scope 3 emissions data in portfolio construction – Osmosis Investment Management

A call for industry change.

Only members with restricted access (ie. academics, asset owners, government and regulatory, independent advisers/trustees and sponsoring employers) can view this article. Please login or join to view.

... Scope 3 emissions (S3) result from activities upstream and downstream of a company’s own operations, which are covered by Scope 1 and 2 emissions (S1+2). S3 encompasses the entire value chain and is of increasing interest to firms and regulators as, when done well, it will more accurately describe a company’s impact on the climate than S1+2 alone.

The EU, for example, plans to introduce S3 integration as a necessary condition in its Paris-aligned benchmark policies over the next few years. The Osmosis team’s research highlights some of the more commonly known problems investors encounter when looking at scope 3 emissions, not least the poor coverage and comparability, but it goes much further, bringing into question whether scope 3 data sets are truly fit for portfolio purpose.

Indeed, Osmosis conclude that integrating scope 3 data (responsible for approx. 90% of a company’s overall emissions) not only leads to portfolios with unattractive investment characteristics (such as low revenue) but directly undermines any claimed environmental benefits.

To the extent that anything on this website constitutes a financial promotion it is exempt from the general prohibition in S21 of FSMA on the basis that the site is only intended for investment professionals as such term is defined in S19 of the Financial Promotions Order. Please note that Pensions for Purpose does not provide consultancy services, advice or personal recommendations on any of the investment opportunities mentioned on the platform. We curate content written by members and do not endorse any underlying funds.

Learn more here