A watershed for climate change stewardship? - Federated Hermes

2021 may come to be viewed as a watershed year for climate change and investor stewardship, with votes on companies’ transition plans and COP26 on the horizon.

Only members with restricted access (ie. academics, asset owners, government and regulatory, independent advisers/trustees and sponsoring employers) can view this article. Please login or join to view.

... If we needed more evidence, the pandemic has served as a wake-up call on climate for businesses, investors, policymakers and individuals, this year’s voting season emphatically provided that. Mainstream sentiment has shifted, and the momentum is with investors calling for faster action on climate change.

With climate transition votes on the agenda for the first time at some 18 annual shareholder meetings, the stage was set for a busy season of scrutinising the fine detail of companies’ transition strategies. Although there is regulatory and societal pressure on companies to align more quickly with the goals of the Paris Agreement, there is no established consensus or unified framework to guide an assessment of how aligned companies are. This presented investors with an analytical challenge and allowed some companies to win votes for transition plans that had significant gaps or were misaligned.

While Federated Hermes support the idea of such a vote in principle, there were some initial concerns about the concept. The high level of support for transition plans suggests these concerns were justified. There is a tendency for investors to vote in line with management, which may suggest they do not have the technical skills or the time to evaluate plans properly.

Federated Hermes applied a rigorous approach in their assessment of transition plans, setting a robust standard of alignment to the Paris Agreement goals for companies to pass. This meant they recommended voting against some high-profile names, including Total, Glencore, Royal Dutch Shell and Aena. This article appears in their Q2 2021 Public Engagement Report.

To the extent that anything on this website constitutes a financial promotion it is exempt from the general prohibition in S21 of FSMA on the basis that the site is only intended for investment professionals as such term is defined in S19 of the Financial Promotions Order. Please note that Pensions for Purpose does not provide consultancy services, advice or personal recommendations on any of the investment opportunities mentioned on the platform. We curate content written by Influencer members and do not endorse any underlying funds.

Learn more here