Investing for return and social impact – is there necessarily a trade-off? - Resonance

Simon Chisholm, Investment Director at social impact investment company Resonance, comments on whether investing for both return and social impact necessarily implies a trade-off between the two objectives.

Only members with restricted access (ie. academics, asset owners, government and regulatory, independent advisers/trustees and sponsoring employers) can view this article. Please login or join to view.

In this article, Simon concludes that investing for both return and social impact actually brings benefits to institutional investors looking to access underserved markets and more sustainable business models.

Date of publication: June 2016

To the extent that anything on this website constitutes a financial promotion it is exempt from the general prohibition in S21 of FSMA on the basis that the site is only intended for investment professionals as such term is defined in S19 of the Financial Promotions Order. Please note that Pensions for Purpose does not provide consultancy services, advice or personal recommendations on any of the investment opportunities mentioned on the platform. We curate content written by Influencer members and do not endorse any underlying funds.

Learn more here